Talk:New Jersey Route 65

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 65 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 6, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the two roads that use former New Jersey Route 65, Port Street and Doremus Avenue, dead-end just after their respective intersection?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 65/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. Is the exact year the NJ 65 designation was removed known?
    Its not known how far it went to, but we know surely it was gone by 1963.
  2. At what time is the route description trying to cover? The present day? The route at the time it was decommissioned? If it is covering the present-day route, then the reference to the NJTP being new needs to be removed and the Central Railroad of New Jersey needs to show the current railroad operator.
    At the time of decomissioning.
  3. "the Turnpike" sounds colloquial.
  4. "elevating on a bridge" sounds awkward.
  5. Change "the truck route of U.S. Route 1 and 9" to "U.S. Route 1/9 Truck".
  6. "still in the city of Newark" is not needed.
  7. "and eliminating Route 25 totally" sounds awkward.
  8. "Central Railroad of New York" should be "Central Railroad of New Jersey", however the current operator needs to be mentioned as this bridge reconstruction was in 2001.
    That is what's marked on current-day.
  9. In the Major intersections table US 1/9 should be one link to that page, not separately to US 1 and US 9.
  10. The note "Route 65 turned off at Doremus Avenue, where Port Street continued to a dead-end" is unnessecary.
  11. What is the direction of NJ 65? N-S as in the infobox or E-W as in the Major intersections table?
  12. Any other sources that can be added?

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 23:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done.Mitch32(The Password is... See here!) 17:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Green shield edit

I can't find why this particular route number was on a green shield. Anybody? YellowAries2010 (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 65. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply