Talk:New Generation Rollingstock

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal New Generation Rollingstock is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Gallery edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Image use policy, paragraph 3 states:

Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved in accordance with the above paragraph or moved to Wikimedia Commons.

The gallery in this article breaches this policy, a link to the commons gallery has been provided. Primetime44 (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Seems that images are being rammed in again. Name of the game isn't to shoehorn in as many as possible per the policy above. Three images of the same train on the same day is an overkill.

To try and resolve the ongoing 'my image is better' dispute in the infobox section, as a neutral observer, the image in this version [1] is superior to the one in [2]. The latter is compromised by a shadow and having people in the foreground. Another alternative may to be to use another image uploaded by someone other than the two combatants? Primetime44 (talk) 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Acceleration (& deceleration) rate of NGR. edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Anyone have that info? 14.203.212.68 (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic