Talk:Nepotism/Archives/2017

This is an archive of past discussions about Nepotism. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Donald Trump

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Given that this article has a side-bar listing Nepotism as a type of corruption, editors must tread carefully before adding information about particular living individuals. The basic WP policies at play are WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP. Even if sourced political commentators say "There is nepotism because so-and-so has named this-or-that relative to a political or organizational position", we cannot allow such opinions to be used in Wikipedia's voice. – S. Rich (talk) 03:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

The definition of nepotism is given here as "Nepotism is favoritism granted to relatives.", so how exactly can living individuals demonstrate favoritism granted to relatives? It seems according to ABC online that "he would not be violating a US anti-nepotism law, based on court rulings the statute does not apply to the White House."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.3.188.198 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

John F. Kennedy is mentioned but was not violating any anti-nepotism laws either. I am not saying the mention of Kennedy is invalid; it is perfectly valid, as is the mention of Trump. Ethics is not law.

I have no idea what this means: "how exactly can living individuals demonstrate favoritism granted to relatives?" Do dead individuals typically demonstrate such favoritism from beyond the grave? Jan sewi (talk) 13:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Furthermore, while we do need to be careful when articles involve living people, Wikipedians are not creating accusations of nepotism against Donald Trump out of whole cloth. The existence and pervasiveness of such accusations is not our responsibility. Jan sewi (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nepotism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070224025607/http://www.catholic-forum.com:80/Saints/ncd05726.htm to http://catholic-forum.com/saints/ncd05726.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nepotism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160105201711/http://www.newstatesman.com/200309290012 to http://www.newstatesman.com/200309290012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Nepotism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)