Talk:Names of Seoul

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Furius in topic Hanseong

Suggestion for merge

edit

Seoul ( Native Korean word) meaning Center/ Capital. Native Korean word comes from Puyo word. Puyo is Native Korean tribe from Manchuria/Northern part of Korean Peninsula. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info2beaware (talkcontribs) 08:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


Chinese transcription for Seoul (for convenience) and one of the old names of Seoul, Gyeongseong are all about the name changes of Seoul inside and outside of Korea, so I don't think the separate articles are needed. And I think this article has to deal with other names for Seoul like Wirye-seong (위례성; 慰禮城, Baekje era), Namgyeong (남경; 南京, Goryeo era), Hanseong (한성; 漢城, Joseon era) or Hanyang (한양; 漢陽) as well. --Appletrees (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Names of Istanbul is a good example. I agree to merge. But, if we merge Gyeongseong into Names of Seoul, contributions by many people at Gyeongseong would be forgot, that sounds too bad. Technically, Names of Seoul should be merged into Gyeongseong.--Mochi (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright, your last sentence sounds reasonable. We need to await for more opinions from others. --Appletrees (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I think we should stick to the status quo, with a link from here to Gyeongseong, and the other names of Seoul, should there ever be a page created for them. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 01:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Consolidate. This is a complicated topic and probably needs a bit more expansion, but the articles could be easily consolidated into a single well-written article, rather than two seperate and rather similar articles. Aep (talk) 09:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note

edit

The requested move discussion at Talk:Gyeongseong#Requested move also determined that it should be merged with this article.--Aervanath (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kingkitao

edit

Old Western maps (before the late 19th c.) refer to Seoul as Kingkitao, based on the Chinese pronunciation of 京畿道 Gyeonggi-do. Obviously this is an exonym but as it appears on so many old maps, perhaps there's a way to mention it?

1882 British atlas 1875 German atlas 1832 German map — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.87.98 (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Names of Seoul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Shanghainese

edit

Why is the Shanghainese pronunciation used as an argument against the new name? It fits perfectly phonetically. --94.134.89.187 (talk) 21:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hanseong

edit

Why was it ever called this? The article gets so caught up in this 2005 Chinese name change that it never bothers to explain where this name came from, nor where most of the other former names came from. Furius (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply