Talk:Naiki Devi

Munshi a propagandist not a trained historian

Hello @Sajaypal007:, Yesterday I removed the source of propagandist K.M Munshi who was not a trained historian from this newly created article Special:MobileDiff/1080494692 but you reverted it today requesting to add some source for the claim, So I found a reliable source from renowned media outlet scorll.in

This “common set of traditions and practices”, as well as a “sense of continuity” – which, to Munshi, seems almost self- evident – do not seem to be so clear at all if one examines the historical citations in the book. Perhaps this is where Munshi lets his subjectivity creep in, since, in his disclaimer at the very beginning of the introduction, he states that he is not a trained historian

106.78.41.83 (talk) 10:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Partly agree with you after reading this article but I suggest you raise this first at WP:RSN, where different viewpoint can be discussed to come at any conlclusion. Sajaypal007 (talk) 10:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

References

Edit warring for the surname of the queen

@Mohammad asfaq: and @Iamritwikaryan:, whether the surname of based on her paternity i.e. Chandela or based on marital relation i.e. Solanki (Chaulukya) should be decided on talk page rather than continuously reverting each other. Please discuss and gain consensus here before making any changes regarding the surname. Sajaypal007 (talk) 05:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Earlier, in this article, surname was not even mentioned, but @Mohammad asfaq: edited the page and mentioned it everywhere. It was just mentioned that she was born into 'Chandel' family and married into 'Solanki' family. But, he didn't like it that way. So, for his information, upon marriage not only surname(family name) changes but 'gotra'(e.g. Bharadvaj, Kaundinya, Vats,etc.) changes too among Hindus (Rajputs). So, arbitrary removal and addition of contents should be stopped. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I want to add brief history And if you want to make her Solanki, then first make Hadi Rani as Chundawat Queen and Durgavati Chandel as Kachwaha. Mohammad asfaq (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@Mohammad asfaq:, Kindly stick to the page and topic, here we are talking about Queen Naiki Devi, it has nothing to do with other Queens, you did not provide any backing to your claims and reverted to changing the goalposts,@Sajaypal007: Sir, this person has again disrupted the page without reaching any consensus or any source. I would request you to undo these and protect the page from him. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Reliability of Merutunga

Hello @Aciram, please understand that Merutunga is not considered reliable by modern scholarship as the article itself clearly mentions. Everything on a Wikipedia article whether the categories, the article body, the article title, has to be based on secondary reliable sources. Categories do reflect what the article body says, and the article body clearly says that Merutanga is not reliable. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)