Talk:Nadeem Anjum
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
 | This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Controversy
editPlease let me remove controversy as per statue, i request humbly everyone to please do not add controversy. CPPConstruct (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CPPConstruct - Could you please give specific reasons for removing this content? Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view, so we must include a balanced amount of negative content on every subject. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 05:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The controversy will not benefit the national image, it will produce a negative image. so therefore, it should be removed. CPPConstruct (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CPPConstruct - Sorry, Wikipedia will not whitewash articles. Read the link in my above comment. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 05:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The controversy will not benefit the national image, it will produce a negative image. so therefore, it should be removed. CPPConstruct (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Request for page protection.
editI want to bring attention to the concerning issue of persistent vandalism and disruption. The page has been subjected to frequent instances of edits and disruptive behavior, compromising the integrity of the information presented.
Despite efforts to revert these edits and maintain the accuracy, the frequency and severity of vandalism have escalated, necessitating stronger measures to ensure its protection. As such, I request that the Wikipedia page be placed under protection lock to prevent further modifications. Atif ahmad8 (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)