Talk:Murray Bowen

Learn more about this page

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Systems High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems psychology.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page needs work

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I respectfully suggest that this page needs work, at least out of respect for Bowen's extraordinary contibution.

Part of the problem is poor writing, including poor grammar. Proof reading seems to have been absent or negilible.

Also, there are inconsistencies in the narrative. An expert on Bowen needs to review the text with an eye to historical and theoretical accuracy.

Michael Bergman Masters in Counseling Therapy Program St. Martins University Lacey, WA 24.17.184.60 (talk) 21:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

We are all working together here. If you have some ideas, go ahead. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Added tags "ref improve" and "cite check"

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that most, if not all of the citations in the reference section are not up to Wikipedia's standards. Several refer to a page number and a date of publication, but have no additional information about the book. One is to a self-published blog, another to a home page of a website, and two seem to just be footnotes added by an editor. As such, this article needs a lot more references to support the content of the article. --Sennsationalist (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Murray Bowen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic