Talk:Multnomah Community Ability Scale

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multnomah Community Ability Scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

How current?

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems to me that it would be so easy to edit that phrase "developed in Multnomah County" to turn it into "developed in [year or decade] in Multnomah County". Do I believe that a lot of articles about mental health deliberately obscure that the date of some assertions, theories, or research is the 18th century? What I believe isn't relevant. Someone who reads this article and sees that the date isn't there, and who is predisposed to believe that the mental health professions (or even ALL professions) obscure facts in order to prevent the public from knowing everything that the public should know in order to intelligently debate whether an idea is hooey or not, will believe that the omitted date is part of a conspiracy. If the research in Multnomah County was done in the 19th century, the public have a right to know that because it bears on the issue of how credible the research IS. And likewise if the research was done in the 2010s.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 21:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence SimpsonReply

Add topic