Talk:Mongolian nationality law

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Dual citizenship

edit

Could the implications of the fact that "dual citizenship is no longer allowed" be explained? Circeus (talk) 01:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's explained under the "History" section. "Before the fall of the Soviet Union, dual citizenship between the two countries was accepted." Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend? 02:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but does that implies IN PRACTICE? For example, doe sit mean that somebody born from parents who are respectively American and Mongolian, in Mongolia, is not allowed to have Mongolian nationality? Does it mean that you have to renounce your nationality before making a Mongolian nationality demand? Etc. Circeus (talk) 03:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

What does it actually mean to say that "Dual citizenship is no longer accepted."? Dual citizenship is a fact, it is not something which states can or need to "recognize" or "accept". Generally, under international law, it is the prerogative of each state to decide whose its citizens are. So if two states both decide Ms. X is a citizen, there is nothing either state can do in response to the decision of the other, other than essentially say "well, if the other one chose to recognize, we won't". The most they can do, is try to prevent it, by one or more of the following:

  1. Require persons being naturalized to renounce their previous citizenship, or at least attempt to, with some punishment if they fail to do so, e.g. by invalidating the naturalization
  2. Provide that citizens who acquire another citizenship lose their citizenship, possibly with a restriction to only when they "voluntarily" acquired it, for some varying intepretations of voluntarily.
  3. Provide that upon reaching a particular age (often 18, or 21 or 25 or something like that), dual citizens have to choose one citizenship or another, and lose the one they don't choose (possibly with some rules about, if they don't explicitly choose, taking their behaviour as constituting an explicit choice, e.g. you lived abroad, so you chose theirs over ours and thus lost ours; you didn't renounce theirs, so you chose theirs over ours and thus lost ours, etc.)

There is no evidence in [1] that Mongolia does any of these. Yes, the consulate may have said "we don't recognize it", but there is no evidence present that means anything more than "we don't like it or approve of it".

Actually, [2] is a good introduction to some of the issues involved, except that it holds to this nebulous idea of states recognizing or not recognizing dual citizenship. All states can do is incorporate measures into their citizenship law to try to prevent dual citizenship. There is no sense beyond this in which recognizing / not-recognizing dual citizenship has any meaning or relevance. --SJK (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I didn't put that ref in. It was this reference before. Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend? 16:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

[3] is just a cut and paste job of [4] (which they can do, because US Federal government documents are in the public domain). So, I think it would be better to refer to the original source, which is reasonably trustworthy, rather than someone else' cut and paste job. --SJK (talk) 22:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mongolian nationality law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mongolian nationality law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply