Talk:Moneycontrol.com
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Moneycontrol.com redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Moneycontrol.com appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.divum.MoneyControl&referrer=utm_source%3DWebAppsPage%26utm_medium%3DInstallButton. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 16:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Article Heavily Relies on Primary v/s Secondary Sources?
editCan you please tell me which sources in the current article are primary?
Currently, the list of 13 sources include references to the following media:
- Livemint.com
- business-standard.com
- exchange4media.com
- newslaundry.com
- businessworld.in
- Press Trust of India
- stockify.net
- byte-man.com
- indiacontentleadership.com
- bestmediainfo.in
Please clarify.
Thank you. BombaiyyaMag (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is also a reference to Moneycontrol.com which you left off the above list. This is likely the primary source. Looking closer, many of these are not reliable some fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's one source, ok. What about the others? Why is Livemint not a reliable source? BombaiyyaMag (talk) 09:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I did not specifically call out Livemint. I said "many of these sources are not reliable and fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA." An example would be Best Media Info which has no byline and is simply a routine announcement of an advertisement they ran. That reference would also fail WP:ORGCRIT which makes me think Moneycontrol.com may not meet notability guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's one source, ok. What about the others? Why is Livemint not a reliable source? BombaiyyaMag (talk) 09:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)