Talk:Mobb Deep

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Prodigy Ends Career With Havoc edit

In April of 2012, Prodigy ended his long-time career with Havoc due to his drinking problems he's dealt with for years & tells fans that there will no longer be another Mobb Deep album. 50 Cent had tried to re-sign Prodigy as a solo artist again on his label without Havoc. Blood Money is now officially their last album.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.228.145.233 (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ [[1]]

ARTICLE CONPLETLEY REDONE edit

I have redone the entire article, adding information on Mobb's early life, rise to success and extensivley, their relationship with G-Unit. I have left the beef section intact, although it seems to be extremley inconclusive and somewhat inaccurate, as well as not propoerly sourced. I have cited all my sources and think the article is now somewhat complete. Anybody with additional info feel free to add, with citations of course. --Mastagags 20:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

    • There is also some discrepancy as to what record labels Mobb Deep was signed to and for what albums. Because of this I am taking out the dates until the labels and exact dates can be verified**
Thank You! your contributions are greatly appreciated. Tutmosis 20:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

whoever keeps putting (RIAA: Platinum) next to the Blood Money section after ive deleted time after time please stop...its the 2nd time i got to delete it. it hasnt gone platinum yet and i doubt it will.

    • Somebody seriously needs to read the last two paragraphs under Rise To Success. I'd say they should just be deleted entirely until somebody can write something more appropriate to Wikipedia's standards** —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.34.227 (talk) 06:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mobb Deep Signs with G-Unit Records edit

You can read about it here. I don't know the date of the actual signing or any of the details, but if someone finds that out they should update the article. --Mjp797 17:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Mobb Deep are some PUNKS, they released "Drop a gem on em" or whatever "after" Tupac died, but they knew that if they released it while he was alive Tupac would woop their butts.

actually 'drop a gem on em' was released shortly after 2pac was released from the jail. However most people outside of new york never herd it until Hell on Earth was released in nov. 1996

"However the claim that they had sold out because of the diss is very hypocritical and many true Mobb Deep fans see it as plain and simple hatin'. This is because although 50 cent made a small indirect diss to the duo, Jay-Z dissed Nas and rumoured slept with his Baby Mother and despite the latter being worse it is credited that Nas has signed to Def Jam of which Jay-Z is President" - Deleted the entire lot because it is obviously an opinion, very badly written and of no real use here. 62.25.109.195 14:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

copyvio edit

I reverted this page way back to the May 22 version, before User:Escobar600ie uploaded huge amounts of copyrighted text from http://www.mp3.com/mobb-deep/artists/31917/biography.html .

I know a lot of stuff got lost, and this page is pretty lame now, but we can rebuild it. (Actually, you can rebuild it. I don't know much about Mobb Deep.)Staecker 02:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

WP:WEASEL edit

The phrase below is pretty much a textbook example of WP:WEASEL:

The track "Shook Ones Pt.II", from their The Infamous album is considered by many to be one of the best hip-hop tracks of all time.

If you have a reputable source you can cite which backs up this claim, then by all means supply it. Until then, it's simply POV text and has no place here.

All the best.
Ξxtreme Unction|yakkity yak 12:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Q-Tip Was Not a Co-producer edit

He produced one song on the Infamous album -- that's it. This article paints the picture that he was an in-house producer taking on a large portion of the work.

Actually, Q-Tip produced three tracks on The Infamous. They were: Give Up The Goods (Just Step), Temperature's Rising, and Drink Away The Pain. He's credited as "The Abstract" and only RHYMES on one of them. I'll still agree with you; him producing only three tracks shouldn't make him be considered as a co-producer. I would expect him to have to produce at least half of the tracks to be considered "co-producer". - Tainted Drifter

Vote on merge edit

I nominated The Infamous (album) page be merged into The Infamous. They basically are the same thing, so no reason to have 2 articles talking about the same information about the same album. Vote at Talk:The Infamous. - Tutmosis 18:53, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Clean up edit

Cleaned up several areas and linked some albums that should be on Wikipedia. There are track listings somewhere, so the articles for the albums can be created. Most of the work was minor editing. Maybe we can remove the copy editing tag now? Just a thought. Jogabbeyjr 20:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

It stands to reason that a mention of Phonte's so called critique of Blood Money should be removed, due to it not being relevent to the information about the album, not to mention the fact that Phonte his self downplays the criticism when asked about it, and the relative insignificance of the comments.

Their names origin edit

I guess the article could say somewhere that Havoc and Prodigy got their names from South Central Cartel members. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperBleda (talkcontribs) 03:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Add this to the article edit

What about Mobb Deep? Jake Venolia is mobb deeps best friend

2Pac: My little homies is attacking them. That's why I'm not even addressing the Mobb Deep issue. They're not even on my level. I find it disrespectful that they would even think they can attack me or the West Coast... So I don't even address those busta ass fakes.. Please print that.... It is on and poppin'. If you don't see me rushin' them that means it's cause they bowed down. Those Mobb Deep fools they don't want it.. Chino XL, Mobb Deep , Bad Boy, Biggie , Lil Ceasar, Junior Mafia all of them is on our hitlist and I'm getting with them with my new click called The Outlaws. They're some Jersey dudes who are keeping that east coast flava poppin' . It's some west coast dudes, southern dudes.. It's the epitome of what I represent. I got Big Syke from Thug Life ...

http://www.daveyd.com/pacwestin.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.152.115.250 (talk) 10:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

300 Bar's and Runnin' edit

Didn't Game write a track called 300 Bars and Runnin'? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.125.121.230 (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC).Reply


Prodigy dressed up as Michael Jackson edit

Anyone got any of those photos?

Deleted some vandalism edit

I deleted the following : == 2001–2004: Decline ==MOBB DEEP ARE SHIT from the page. This is pretty much vandalism, but if anyone disagrees let me know. - HiphopisNOTdead 14:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

i disagree :) -- Supreme euphanasia 16:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Mobb Deep Album The Infamous.jpg edit

 

Image:Mobb Deep Album The Infamous.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Picture for Mobb Deep edit

If your going to have a picture for Mobb Deep use a picture with both members.


...Well then if some one IS gonna have a picture of Mobb Deep could someone AT LEAST leave a discription of which one it Mobb Deep!?

Like leave a thumbnail that says "Mobb Deep wearing the Green Sweatband".

Ya Boi Krakerz

Vandalism edit

Lock this page mod/admin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.227.193 (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mobb Deep only has two members, Prodigy and Havoc...The others listed are not in the group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.75.245 (talk) 15:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Safe is Cracked...new studio album or compilation album? edit

I think this is simply another compilation album of unreleased Mobb Deep songs over the years, in the likes of "The Infamous Archives" and such...--Tainted Drifter (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC) and in chicago in dark streets mobb deep inspires people to "get the hell out of dodge" and rap aout real things but cant because people just listen to a lame rapper that dont put work in his music which is lil wayne. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.163.22 (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cleaned Up the Article for Mobb Depp with Justificable Reasons edit

As what most of you probably have seen by now I've cleaned up the Mobb Depp Wikipedia article on the sole basis of grammarical, prose and English writing standards known in the Academia. If you're wondering I did not change any initial nor crucial information regarding this New York City-based Hip Hop group; I just simply cleaned it up to the established standards of an encyclopedia by doing by the traditional standards of collegiate writing. I've also searched for an image of the Hip Hop group in which is part of Creative Commons where more than one sources like this, the Wikipedia article, uses it as well. I strongly urge you to not revert back but if you have any disputes of the changes, I would like for you to notify me first because I do not want to engage in "revert wars" over this matter. Moreover, if anyone is skilled at HTML in regards to referencing I'd suggest a rewrite in terms of the last three references within this article. Thank you for reading.

Centrist Fiasco 06:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

I have tidied the last three <ref>s, as requested. I used the template {{cite web}}; this template could be usefully employed on most of the other <ref>s. HairyWombat 19:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:MobbDeep.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:MobbDeep.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mobb Deep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply