This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
A fact from Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Co. of Texas v. May appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
An enlightening followup section recommendation for future Wikipedia editors: How much did the MKT, and other railroads operating in Texas, end up paying for letting all these weeds run wild? What mitigation measures did they take - did they try pulling them all over the years, or did they spray pesticides along all their Texas track? Or did they convince the legislature to change the law? Tempshill (talk) 23:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also, Clay May had no lawyer. It would be a very interesting addition to the article to find out who wrote the brief on his behalf, if there was one - or did he just take the train (the MKT, one would hope) to Washington, show up at the SCOTUS, and argue his case in front of the justices in person? Jimmy Stewart would have hoped so. Tempshill (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
what's wrong with "Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Company" that it gets a "sic" in it? Are cases usually styled with "and" instead of "&" ? 75.87.138.107 (talk) 11:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NE2 put it thereReply
