Talk:Mission Santa Inés

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aidancesar, Isaacesqueda, Portergustin45. Peer reviewers: Sdomai.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Image vs. text

Such information as shown at right should be incorporated into the article as text.--Lordkinbote 20:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Why the prehistory of the native American peoples?

This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mission Santa Inés. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223043901/http://sbthp.org/millshistory.html to http://sbthp.org/millshistory.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051110140734/http://www.mymission.org/images/santinez.gif to http://www.mymission.org/images/santinez.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Isabel Torres' Peer Review

- the lead captures a good amount of information that summarizes the article well

• I would be careful of the last sentence being a run on. Maybe add a period after Concepción, and begin a new sentence with "It was designed..."
• also, I would add a citation following the sentence about its founding information (who, when, etc.) to be able to rely on a source for accuracy of that information

- in the first paragraph of your History section, you are missing a few citations

• I would add one right after you state the date of the earthquake, the date it was dedicated, and the date the mill was built; it might seem a little redundant but because they are specific numbers it will contribute to the reliability of your article if you can link sources to those facts
• I would also consider adding a citation for the thickness of the new church walls, that is also a very specific fact

- the first sentence of your second paragraph of the history section needs a citation

- at the end of that (^) same second paragraph, I would add a citation to reference where you received that information

- for the last few paragraphs of the history section, I would add citations when you mention a specific date or name

- I read this as a run-on sentence: "It was through the efforts of Father Alexander Buckler in 1904 that reconstruction of the mission was undertaken, though major restoration was not possible until 1947 when the Hearst Foundation donated money to pay for the project."

• try to separate it as two sentences

- in the very last sentence of the history section, your description of the Capuchin Franciscan Fathers' care of the mission as "excellent" could be considered too opinionated so I would avoid using an adjective similar to that

- the visuals add a lot to your article

- overall your history section gives readers a very informative overview of the mission's history (good job!)

Sarah Domai Peer Review

• The introduction is concise and gives context to the rest of your article. Where did you get your information for the first paragraph of the introduction?
• The pictures and descriptions associated with them provide visuals that help relate the text to the actual place. It's helpful because it gives the reader an idea of the place. Adding a picture from the present-day church or even the wreckage of the old church would help the reader visualize its relevance today.
• In the paragraph about the fire at the mission, finding more sources that detailed the event or more specifically the role that the mission played can make the description stronger.
• There are no citations from the fire story down, so where did you get this information from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdomai (talk • contribs) 19:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Ana Charco Peer Review

The article is well articulated with facts regarding its history. Something that might be good to mentioned could be what was the overall purpose of the church and the impact to had on the community. Also, make sure to add how the church connects to the concept of borderlands. Make sure to cite the information and to add references for the information your provided towards the end.