Talk:Mise en place
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
2008-04-4 Automated pywikipediabot message edit
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- The article does not appear in wikitionary as of today. Because the article gives more information than a definition, I suspect that it is appropriate to leave it in Wikipedia Oliana (talk) 16:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- As the notice said, the content was not removed from WP. Wiktionary editors can decide whether to retain some of the content there or not, and what modifications may be appropriate. —DIV (194.193.139.240 (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC))
Support good-faith IP editors: insist that Wikipedia's administrators adhere to Wikipedia's own policies on keeping range-blocks as a last resort, with minimal breadth and duration, in order to reduce adverse collateral effects; support more precisely targeted restrictions such as protecting only articles themselves, not associated Talk pages, or presenting pages as semi-protected when viewed from designated IP ranges.
- As the notice said, the content was not removed from WP. Wiktionary editors can decide whether to retain some of the content there or not, and what modifications may be appropriate. —DIV (194.193.139.240 (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC))
Title edit
Isn't the title of this entry misspelled? Shouldn't it be "mise en place"?? I've fixed the body of the article but I don't know how to fix the title. Sun Jul 6 22:08:21 EDT 2008 Norman
Usage of term edit
I use this term in my restaurant as an encompassing term for my front of house employees as well as my kitchen staff and am aware that other restaurants do the same -Steve- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.23.145 (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
T-shirt edit
This is also the phrase that appears on the Tshirt for sale on shirt.woot.com on 4/2/09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.22.122 (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism edit
I've removed a silly bit from this page talking about a Serbian man and his hot wife, which clearly has nothing to do with the subject. Bas, 29 august 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.109.109.155 (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Origin edit
The term Mise En Place was not coined by the CIA Culinary Institute of America. It traces its roots to classical French cooking professionals (Careme, Escoffier) and before - long before CIA was even a twinkle in the eye of American Chefs - I'll edit later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyJKingman (talk • contribs) 13:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)