Talk:Ministry of Education (China)
(Redirected from Talk:Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China)
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Amigao in topic Copy and paste issues
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education
editThe jurisdiction of the MoE is mainland China, in other words, PRC-administered territories excluding Hong Kong and Macao. This article previous had no category, and I added it to category:Mainland China. User:SchmuckyTheCat moved it to category:People's Republic of China in his edit. — Instantnood July 3, 2005 09:29 (UTC)
- It's an agency of the PRC government. I don't care if it's jurisdiction is a km² of the gobi desert. SchmuckyTheCat 3 July 2005 15:59 (UTC)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-46885317/why-thousands-of-los-angeles-teachers-are-striking
editA Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Copy and paste issues
editCfls, you probably ought to review WP:RS and WP:COPYPASTE before you paste gobs of machine-translated text into articles. Amigao (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Cfls, it doesn't seem like you're interested in building WP:CONSENSUS here. Amigao (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- All sources had been clearly addressed in the article. All sources' reliability is comparable to how the entries of United States Department of Education, United Kingdom Department for Education, and other worldwide government agencies cite. Government sources here are reliable for introducing its responsibilities and internal organizational structures. Cfls (talk) 15:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's not the issue here. The issue is blanking content already cited with WP:RS and replacing it with WP:COPYPASTE machine-translated text. If you wish to add to the article with WP:RS, fine. But do not blank well-cited content. Amigao (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- I see that you mean. All well-cited content will be kept in future edits. But please do not perform overall reversion after the inclusion of the original "well-cited content." Thank you. Cfls (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Always best to stick to WP:SECONDARY WP:RS as well per policy. Thanks. Amigao (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- I see that you mean. All well-cited content will be kept in future edits. But please do not perform overall reversion after the inclusion of the original "well-cited content." Thank you. Cfls (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's not the issue here. The issue is blanking content already cited with WP:RS and replacing it with WP:COPYPASTE machine-translated text. If you wish to add to the article with WP:RS, fine. But do not blank well-cited content. Amigao (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- All sources had been clearly addressed in the article. All sources' reliability is comparable to how the entries of United States Department of Education, United Kingdom Department for Education, and other worldwide government agencies cite. Government sources here are reliable for introducing its responsibilities and internal organizational structures. Cfls (talk) 15:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)