Talk:Ming–Kotte War
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 6, 2013. |
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Sino-Xiongnu War - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
No title edit
Not Sinhalese or remotely Shri Lankan but even I have not heard much about about this chapter of history . I am a student of History and know my Sino History from Kabulai to Qin .
I have to question the neutrality of this page as it has been edited recently also more than history it looks like taken from pages of popular history .
Personally I do think its written/authored by PRC Masterbator . You will find similar edits regarding Sendai Taiwan so forth .
On a different note the level of Moderation has been quite pathetic
The quality of articles Frontpage updates leaves a lot to be desired starting from the promoted articles itself
Also I have seen too many articles propagating popular history than actual history . Other than neutral preceptive I see biased perspective right from Falklands to Crimean etc etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.179.73.208 (talk) 15:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Firstly, you should watch it who you are calling "PRC Masterbator" (notwithstanding that all the used literature is western and the PRC isn't even mentioned). Secondly, the citations are in plain view and I would like to see you contest it (do ping me if you do, but I know you won't). Thirdly, how about you bugger off with the rest off your equally useless or irrelevant comments in the context of this article, student of history. --Cold Season (talk) 17:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
the English and grammar in the article are pretty bad edit
I would clean it up, but I'm not sure how much of this article is factual. HammerFilmFan (talk) 10:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- No one requested a clean-up, so I don't see the point of a message that you won't do a clean-up. I think you can figure out how to check the factuality... with the references and all that in the article. --Cold Season (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)