Talk:Military glider
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Single use only?
editIn the article it says (about military gliders): "These craft were used for a single flight only." I think that's not true, because I remember reading about allied parties that recovered gliders after Operation Market Garden. Can't find a reliable source at the moment though. Muijz 10:45, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
(moved from Talkpage of Glider) Muijz 14:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- On a forum the son of a C47 pilot writes his fathers plane was used to retrieve those gliders that were still airworthy enough for re-use, and that his father has a copy of his orders to retrieve gliders. See also this page where it says retrieving gliders by means of a technique called The Snatch was used extensively in the China-Burma-India Theater. Muijz 14:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I was in the 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment in the late 90's, while looking thru old log books and other materials from their participation in WWII (325th Glider Infantry Regiment)there were records of how many gliders were recoverable after the landings during Operation Market Garden. Of 60 gliders used, 4 were still serviceable. 13 were damaged but repairable, the rest were unrecoverable. Doctrine of the time also stated that gliders were to be re-used. --82nd Paratrooper 20:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Impossible
edit'Neither Lord Gilbert nor the other politicians present appeared to be aware that this would have been impossible.
Why would this have been impossible? Range? Anti-aircraft fire? Non-existence of suitable gliders?
Assault Glider Merge
editInteresting. When I looked for gliders, I did not find the Military Glider section. Need to make sure links are in place. Cheer. --Flightsoffancy (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
What happens to the soldiers flying the glider?
editare they a part of the fighting force or just "drivers"? were regular GI's trained for this type of job or airmen? it should be mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.67.25 (talk) 03:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- They were pilots but they did fight I have some paper sources on the subject and will add something this week... RP459 (talk) 03:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- In the British case (Glider Pilot Regiment) they were experienced soldiers who were then trained as pilots. Once on the ground they formed up as units and fought. A number received MM (eg look up Louis Edmund Hagen at [this site and DFCs at Arnhem. GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Could you add that to the article? I will add to it later this week... RP459 (talk) 13:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- In the British case (Glider Pilot Regiment) they were experienced soldiers who were then trained as pilots. Once on the ground they formed up as units and fought. A number received MM (eg look up Louis Edmund Hagen at [this site and DFCs at Arnhem. GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Landing
editHow was a descent and landing initiated? Did they crash while landing?Lestrade (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Lestrade
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Military glider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080112143239/http://www.regiments.org:80/regiments/uk/specfor/Glider.htm to http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/specfor/Glider.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070818111124/http://www.pointvista.com:80/WW2GliderPilots/index.htm to http://www.pointvista.com/WW2GliderPilots/index.htm/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Military glider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722175557/http://www.usafa.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet_print.asp?fsID=9412&page=1 to http://www.usafa.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet_print.asp?fsID=9412&page=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)