| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
self-reference edit
- There is a user named mmales who edited this page. Is this a self-edit? Is this appropriate? Chandrakirti (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- According to http://www.cjcj.org/about_us/whos/who#MIke , Mike Males sits on the board of NYRA. NYRA hosts the external link for the video. Is this link appropriate? Chandrakirti (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Not relevant edit
it is like every random geezer thinks they be famous and need to be on da' wiki! Well, that aint the way this wiki works. You gots to be notable if you want to be a wiki. You caint just create yo own page for yo own damn selves. DELETE IT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.138.33 (talk) 04:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm the user, mmales, who is the subject of this page. I did not set up this page but I would be happy to supply any information to update it and address the concerns. Mmales (talk) 21:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Mike A. Males writes: As a former financial and content contributor, after witnessing Wiki editors' biases and bigotries on the issue of adolescents in the Wiki ageism essay, I no longer want to participate in Wikipedia in any fashion. I did not set up this page, the editors will not let me update it to provide accurate information (even without bias), I have no desire to respond to the incoherent idiot who asked for deletion or negotiate the technicalities of responding to editors' demands for more information or evidence of relevance that they then refuse to incorporate, so just delete the whole damn thing.Mmales (talk) 06:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)