Talk:Midnight (Hunter novel)

Mosspelt

Uhh... Mosspelt didn't die, did she? She's a warrior in The Sight. 209.30.147.52 12:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

No, she did not die. ~Crowstar~ 12:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

So why is she there? 209.30.147.52 15:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Leafkit and Squirrelkit

Just to let you guys know, Leafkit and Squirrelkit were bor in FQ, not Midnight. I didn't change it, because I didn't know if there was a reason for it, but you might want to change it...

   ~Dovefeather (can't log in)

FQ? What's that? Dance3600 (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NewProphecybook1.jpg

Image:NewProphecybook1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Plot issues

I've removed the tag and readded the plot. If you object, please provide some evidence that there is any kind of consensous that removing material like this is a good thing. Hobit (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I added the plot tag, but the effect was not what I expected, I was hoping to attract some people willing to help with adding more non-plot info. Thanks--Res2216firestar 22:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Overly detailed plot summary is against Wikipedia policy. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Support removal of disputed plot tag per [1], i.e. as the recent RfC has demonstrated that the community does not sufficiently support including "not" as part of plot. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 18:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Indeed. A plot summary is like a film summary, and is allowed by precedent and guideline. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Overly detailed plot summary is against Wikipedia policy. I find it interesting that whenever one the rescue squadron shows up, more of you soon follow to simply reaffirm each other standpoints on articles that you have never edited before and appear to have no interest in. This is no way to build consensus or improve the project. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually it isn't. A recent RfC has determined that Not#Plot lacks consensus; hence the disputed tag. Anyway, indiscriminately removing content while never attempting to reference it does not improve the project and nor does edit warring with multiple editors, including some of those who actually have been working on the articles in question. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 19:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

And aside from lack of consensus, deleting information from a plot calling it "overly detailed" is a judgement call... one with which others are in disgreement. Length of plot detail bears direct relationship to what is being described. A short story might require a paragraph. A long novel would logically require a longer plot summary. All in direct relationship to what is needed to best inform the average visitor to these pages. Not for me... not for other editors... but for those who read wiki and expect to be informed. This one might require use of a delicate scalpel perhaps, but certainly not a machete. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Midnight (Hunter novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080304065805/http://www.wandsandworlds.com/community/node/52 to http://www.wandsandworlds.com/community/node/52
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505035257/http://www.wandsandworlds.com/community/node/2998 to http://www.wandsandworlds.com/community/node/2998

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)