Talk:Michael Tugendhat

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Other newspapers and other sources, for balance

edit

Right now we cite The Guardian much more than other sources. That's fine, and it's a reliable source (and that's what falls out of Google readily), but it's a party to some of the specific cases, and all British newspapers have a direct interest in Tugendhat's claims as an advocate and rulings as a judge. I'll try to diversify the sources used for the article, but if someone can find corroborating references in other publications (and ideally in non-newspaper sources like academic books), even if they only repeat stuff that we're already sourcing to the Gruniad and other papers, that would put the article on a rather firmer footing. We have some (qualified) praise of him in the article, but, for balance, hasn't anyone (notable) criticised this chap or his rulings? -- Finlay McWalterTalk 21:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Tugendhat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Tugendhat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply