This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I saw the evidence of a possible copyright violation, which as an editor suggested, it may have been copied from http://www.mattielietz.com/. But, I think the sentences above the bullet points have been re-written as an intention avoid infringement. I think the bullet points have been copied from the source, but as they are sources of information rather than sentences, I don't think we should remove them should we? Minimac (talk) 08:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
That seems reasonable. I think what made me sensitive to it is that it was added by a user with the same name as that website's author, which makes me inclined to scrutinize the contribution more closely. (And if the website and article page's author were to be actually verified as the same person, the copy-paste thing would be moot anyway, at least as far as copyright goes.) --Closeapple (talk) 10:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
