Untitled edit

I added a NPOV tag because this article seems like it's been lifted from a school brochure or something. I don't know anything about the school, but I can tell it isn't written objectively. Smedley Hirkum 04:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's objective. Everything stated is factual and is not slanted in any way. Yes, some of this is from the catalog, but again, it is objective info (numbers of folks taking AP courses, the acreage of the campus, etc.) Perhaps we're looking at different pages?—Preceding unsigned comment added by KChams (talkcontribs) 22:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article is lifted from the school brochure. I used to attend there. I can't believe how much of it is "marketed over".—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.181.76 (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

63% of the students are from south korea??? i dont think so son.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.55.108 (talk) 01:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Even the non-factual non-brochure stuff they selectively reveal the truth.... Yes Young Gunz filmed there, and payed the school money, but it was banned from being shown in morning meeting to the students and those showing it got in trouble. corruption, anyone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SammyAsher (talkcontribs) 15:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Attention Readers edit

Beware! The article was plagued by weasel words that decrease the specificity of detail. Edits painting a vague picture, and the ones done before my edits (see history), may mislead readers who are unfamiliar with the school. Any chance of misinterpreting the descriptions in the article, due to the way it is written, should NOT be tolerated on Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia is not a place for articles of disputed neutrality, any reader should know that this SUBJECTIVELY written article should be rewritten. Till then, the admin tags should remain in place for the potential misinformation and advertising of this school's extrinsic and sensational attributes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luige (talkcontribs) 06:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notable students/alumni edit

The opening paragraph lists a group of alumni; they should be moved to the "Notable students" section which incorporates those who attended as well as those who graduated. I won't do this myself as some of those in the intro paragraph don't have mention of The Masters School in their wiki article, let alone a citation. Those who don't have a wiki article don't even have a red link, so I'm not sure about keeping them. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

POV Dispute edit

I added a dispute against the POV of this article because the information presented is uncited and the site seems to be maintained by those who have interest in the school. This fails to be journalistic, and since the information is from a "self-published source", it may be inappropriate. Furthermore, there are repeated comments on the talk page about the lack of neutrality, yet the tag keeps getting removed. This article may need to be locked to prevent removal of this POV warning by school administration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlederluis (talkcontribs) 04:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Which parts exactly do you find objectionable? I'm not saying there are or aren't things that are POV-ish, but I'm curious as to what you think are. Esrever (klaT) 05:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

While I'm in no position to comment on the remainder of the article, I deleted a paragraph about a recent controversy for asking an admitted Lesbian student to leave. This incident involves a totally different school near Hartford, Conn. Whoever popped that paragraph into the present article (when it is obvious that the locations and coats of arms are totally distinct) committed the worst solecism that I have ever seen on Wikipedia. Paul Emmons (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


Proposed merge with Tower (school newspaper) edit

(moved from Talk:The Masters School by — Smjg (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC))Reply

No indication of independent coverage of newspaper BillHPike (talk, contribs) 20:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply