Talk:Maryland Route 10

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Good articleMaryland Route 10 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 26, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 10/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I'll take this one. Not right now, though. –TCN7JM 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

  • Pasadena and Glen Burnie only need to be linked once each.

Route description

  • allowing access between MD 177 and the direction of Baltimore. I can't really understand what this is saying, honestly.
    • I rewrote that part to remove the confusion by explicitly stating what the ramps do.  V 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

History

  • The middle of the second paragraph is pretty choppy. Maybe use conjunctions to combine a couple sentences?
    • Can you explain which sentences you think need work?  V 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
      • The freeway from the Beltway to Furnace Branch was under construction by 1972; the highway opened from the Beltway to MD 710 in December 1972. MD 710 had been relocated in conjunction with the construction of MD 10 and the Beltway in 1972; the portion of the Beltway from MD 2 to MD 10 opened at the same time. The Arundel Expressway was marked as MD 10 by 1974. Construction on the extension south to MD 648 was underway by 1975. Kinda reads like a list, in my opinion, maybe with the exception of the first phrase of the second sentence. –TCN7JM 02:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
        • I rewrote most of those sentences. Let me know how it looks.  V 00:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
          • Looks better! –TCN7JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Major intersections

  • Normally, I'd criticize on your use of both commas and semicolons in the junction list, but I can see how it works here.

That's it. I'm putting this   on hold so you can fix stuff. –TCN7JM 17:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review, TCN7JM.  V 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem! Pass!TCN7JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maryland Route 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply