Talk:Maryland Route 10/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I'll take this one. Not right now, though. –TCN7JM 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Infobox

• Pasadena and Glen Burnie only need to be linked once each.
  • Done.  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Route description

• allowing access between MD 177 and the direction of Baltimore. I can't really understand what this is saying, honestly.
  • I rewrote that part to remove the confusion by explicitly stating what the ramps do.  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

History

• The middle of the second paragraph is pretty choppy. Maybe use conjunctions to combine a couple sentences?
  • Can you explain which sentences you think need work?  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
    • The freeway from the Beltway to Furnace Branch was under construction by 1972; the highway opened from the Beltway to MD 710 in December 1972. MD 710 had been relocated in conjunction with the construction of MD 10 and the Beltway in 1972; the portion of the Beltway from MD 2 to MD 10 opened at the same time. The Arundel Expressway was marked as MD 10 by 1974. Construction on the extension south to MD 648 was underway by 1975. Kinda reads like a list, in my opinion, maybe with the exception of the first phrase of the second sentence. –TCN7JM 02:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
      • I rewrote most of those sentences. Let me know how it looks.  VC  00:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
        • Looks better! –TCN7JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Major intersections

• Normally, I'd criticize on your use of both commas and semicolons in the junction list, but I can see how it works here.

That's it. I'm putting this on hold so you can fix stuff. –TCN7JM 17:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your review, TCN7JM.  VC  02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Not a problem! Pass! –TCN7JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)