Films? edit

What is the connection between Garbus, who is an attorney, and the list of Films? Sbowers3 (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

He appears in the films, one as an actor, the second two are documentaries, he is an interviewee. In addition, all of the films deal with the legal issues in which Garbus was involved in.

Verifiability and reliable sources edit

One of Wikipedia's most important policies is verifiability: "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."

I believe all of the quotations have now been sourced.

The standard for sources is secondary sources. The sources to this article are primary sources and tertiary sources, which are considered less reliable. This article would be improved by providing references to reliable secondary sources, e.g. newspapers or magazines.

Verifiability would also be improved if each section had footnotes to the source of information, rather than just having a list of references. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I believe all of these issues have been resolved as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.117.166.110 (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Each of the films deal with first amendment and other legal issues in which martin garbus is interviewed at length The first film has interviews with martin garbus that deal with free speech in america The second deals with attacks on the Motion Picture Associations rating system for movies.Martin Garbus disscusses censorship a lawsuit he filed challenging the constitionality of the Ratings Code. The third film deals with the life and legal problems of Lenny Bruce.Martin Garbus who was his la~wyyer is interviewed at length —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deborah vogel (talkcontribs) 00:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Client list edit

I checked with another experienced editor. We both agree that the client list is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Please do not re-include it. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The client list has been taken off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenmcohen (talkcontribs) 12:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why is a (selected) client list not appropriate? --Nbauman (talk) 17:17, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

*This article has multiple issues.* Please help *improve it *"A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection" edit

In an effort to address and have removed the language about the article having multiple issues: If you are a frequent contributor to the page and have a relationship to the subject, please declare a "Conflict of Interest" before making additional edits. Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI - Wikipedia Kim Connolly (talk) 13:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Additional line to add to Martin Garbus Bio edit


  • What I think should be changed:
  • Why it should be changed:
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Since 2020, Mr. Garbus is a member of the Advisory Board of the Harvard Medical School Teaching Hospital. https://clbb.mgh.harvard.edu/advisory-board-3/martin-garbus-2/

Kim Connolly (talk) 18:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Kim Connolly   Declined per WP:NOTCV. Regards,  Spintendo  01:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

References