Comment

edit

I'm not sure why Schweiker is described as becoming governor as a "direct result" of the 9/11/2001 attacks. At the very most, he became governor as a "very circuitous and tangential result" of the attacks. Tom Ridge would have had to have died or been incapacitated in the attacks for this to be a direct result. I'm eliminating this language as it seems to me to be non-notable at best and non-sensical at worst. --Cjs56 20:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mark's son Eric wishes that he had a pet kangaroo and enjoys playing sports as varied as basketball, sky diving, and bocce.

Don't think this should be in there without a citation. It seems less than relevant. --ladyPolitik (talk) 16:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mark S. Schweiker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removed

edit

Seems to be more than enough citations in current version of article. Slacker13 (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply