This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The ink was barely dry on this new entry when the Wiki police weighed in. Give me a break. Look at the citations. The article is a work in progress and will soon include multiple sections. Bwark (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Bwark I was simply trying to alert you of a few a few concerns that I had about the article, even is they were admittedly bad-placed. I have to help newcomers, remove spam, and read entire articles to help improve them to the same quality as others in the encyclopaedia. But after one misstep I get called out as bite-ey even though I simply voiced a few concerns with you. I understand that it was difficult to get permission from the author for her picture, but I never would have known that without you mentioning it. Going forward, please assume I was trying my best. Is there any other way that I can make it up to you? I'd hate to leave you upset over something I did. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply. I realize you were trying to alert me to your concerns and I think you were right to point out that the article came across as somewhat promotional. Your concerns made me rethink my approach, reword this new article and add more corroborating citations. Sorry to react so petulantly, but I had gone through a tough couple of hours trying to find ways of accurately summarizing this author's work and then saw your concerns as rejection. Thanks again for all your efforts. They helped me with this new entry. Bwark (talk) 01:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}