Talk:Marion Hammer
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Notability concerns addressed edit
I looked around and found that there have been many articles written about Hammer by reliable independent sources. I picked the best of these as references for the most basic facts about Hammer's career, avoiding (I hope) all of the puffery that filled the previous versions of this article.
If someone else agrees that this material addresses the concern over Hammer's notabiliity, I hope that person will consider removing the notabiliity tag. 71.197.166.72 (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Inaccurate biography? edit
SkippG has removed large amounts of material. I'm opening this discussion so that they can seek consensus for their proposed changes.- MrX 🖋 18:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Neutrality of wording in Harassment Section edit
This section appears to be a bit out of date, and the first paragraph assumes that her claims of harassment are accurate and uses wording calling her a "target" and treating her fear of physical violence as well-founded without explanation to back that up. In my opinion, the section needs to be expanded or reworded to be more clearly neutral.
Section 2.3 also seems to have some neutrality issues and could be organized much better. Michaelwallace22 (talk) 23:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)