Talk:Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bri in topic Law360 as a source
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Cannabis legislation proposals in the United States was copied or moved into Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Cannabis' "420 Collaboration" in 2022. |
Legalization or decriminalization edit
I have raised the question of terminology, legalization or decriminalization, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Law360 as a source edit
Some info on lobbying by Amazon was removed challenging Law360 as a reliable source [1]. It seemed OK to me when I included it. Can we discuss its merits? ☆ Bri (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- JD Supra was the source I found questionable, not Law360. UpdateNerd (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- My mistake, I meant JD Supra which admit doesn’t havethe same editorial control but it is posting the legal experts' interpretation, but no big deal. I have reinstated the passage with a Reuters source which is certainly regarded to be a gold standard in terms of reliability and independence. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- As a p.s., the source used the term "public policy team" which is what Amazon uses [2], explaining its function is "enhances Amazon’s advocacy before policymakers at all levels of government". We need to write in plain language, so I added a parenthetical to state the plain term lobbying. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)