Talk:Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez III

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Really??

edit

"Marquez lost the very controversial decision to Pacquiao", this sounds like it should be in the article. Did anybody watch the fight? This is why box is viewed by many as a joke now.NGK-Lion (talk) 07:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pacquiao/Mayweather

edit

An important note here is also the public announcement by Pacquiao that he accepts Mayweather's challenge. A bit out of character for Pacquiao. He usually concedes that it's up to his people. Also, anyone notice Marquez was naked and hiding it with his sombrero in the aftermath interview? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.104.78.185 (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply