Talk:Mammut Sports Group

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled

edit

I don't quite see where this page should be " blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person"? As far as I can see, I only brought up objective facts about it. (Awanhyr, author of the article)

I don't think this is advertising either... There are a lot of articles about enterprises - look at the Nike, Inc. article for example. Why should this one be any worse? (Sturmknecht)

Yup, I think we are going to have to reconsider the phrasing of the {{db-spam}} template; we are currently using it to cope with the large number of uncritical articles about businesses that aren't notable. Essentially, the emphasis appears to have shifted from tone of content towards not demonstrating notability. Anyway, regarding this article, the subject is certainly notable, for example there is plenty of news coverage. I've removed the speedy in the finest traditions of ignoring rules. Addhoc 20:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mammut Sports Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply