Talk:Malcolm Goldstein

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ribbonabaca in topic Please restore CD cover image

Jewish?

edit

Was Goldstein a Jew? --84.228.160.209 23:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why not ask him? He's still living. Goldstein is usually a Jewish name, but it's hard to say if he is religious or not. Badagnani 23:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
yes, of sorts --Diablorex 06:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please restore CD cover image

edit

Please restore the CD cover image; it was improper to delete summarily. Thanks. Badagnani 04:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, it cannot be used this way per WP:FU, and you cannot just remove the disputed fair use tag, as I have advised you on your talk page. -- But|seriously|folks  04:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
On second thought, I have restored the image. But please do not add it to this article as it is currently written, because that would violate WP:FU. Thanks. -- But|seriously|folks  04:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

It was extremely hasty at best, and immature and rude at worst, to delete the image summarily as you did (then to threaten me on my "Talk" page, after having targeted numerous images of mine in one go, showing that you'd been digging through my contributions in the "wikistalking" manner with which we've become all too familiar over the past year). That was very, very bad and wrong of you. It would be very kind of you to exercise a bit more deliberation and consideration for other editors in future, thanks. I'm afraid I don't agree with you that the cover photo was used improperly. Badagnani 21:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are misusing the term Wikistalking in an effort to cover up your own transgressions of Wikipedia's image policies. Also, I did what you asked and restored the image. I'm not asking you to thank me, but your continuing criticism is neither appropriate nor appreciated. If you want to get a third opinion, feel free to take any of my tags to Wikipedia:Fair use review. -- But|seriously|folks  22:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
This image use does clearly violate WP:FU. It should be removed or put in a context that follows the guidelines.Ribbonabaca (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

note on source addition

edit

Added external link to liner notes, and for full disclosure I work for the non-profit educational resource linked to. The notes provide reference for several facts in this article. Ribbonabaca (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply