Talk:Mainling
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 9 April 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mainling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 9 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mainling County to Mainling. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Again? Still a county? edit
@Kautilya3: In your revert actions, you more-overly kept the current "County" statement, even zh name has kept in 县, I'd love to know why? Is office announcement even unreliable now? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 9 April 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus at Talk:Tsona#Requested move 9 April 2023 and per the arguments below. (closed by non-admin page mover) MaterialWorks (contribs) 01:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Mainling County → Mainling – Originally I believe that such move won't be controversial as not only officially announced, but also adopted by several reliable sources, but a user reverted my move and later, explained their own rationale that why it's controversial, so far let's start a move request instead. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- (It is the same thing from Talk:Tsona County) Support. (I will use quotation marks for the names of the types of administrative divisions as I refer to the governmental classification) I am completely shocked by Kautilya3's erratic and problematic understanding on WP:RMUM and WP:OFFICIAL. Among all the things that need to be considered, the only major one is whether "Tsona" is currently a "county" and a "(county-level) city", and the answer is obvious that it is currently a "(county-level) city", and it does not matter that whether it is determined by a source in what language. So let me make the currect situation clear: "Tsona" is currently not a "county" at all (which has been announced and implemented by the government), but Kautilya3 considered it as "still a 'county'", which contradicts to the actual situation. If the current naming itself is erratic and can lead to misunderstanding (for this case calling an administrative division which is currently not a "county" at all as a "county"), the change of the article name is not the matter about WP:OFFICIAL and WP:UCRN, but the matter about WP:5P1 instead. Sanmosa Outdia 00:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Mainling is now a city. A city is never formally referred to as a county in China regardless if it is county-level or prefecture-level. Midperson (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support per this source announcing the change. I hope the closer will also take into account the move request at Talk:Tsona County. The situation for these two articles is the same as far as I can tell, so it would be silly if one of them ends up moved and the other doesn't. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.