This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The bottom pic (untopped chambers) is technically of Bowydd (which incorporated Fotty), albeit it's now being wroked as part of the combined Maenofferen/Llechwedd site. I can't see any point in changing it as it's a pretty minor issue, which is really only of interest to very few of us! Vanoord 13:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
The dates in this article had been changed (vandalised) by adding a hundred years, I have changed them back but tbh not sure what else has been done, doesn't seem grammatically correct, if someone else can look at it--Pandaplodder (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The dates have been corrected to as the appeared before the vandalisim took place. One or two minor grammaticals done at same time.
Keith 19:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
