Talk:Mademoiselle de Scuderi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Personal essaying edit

This is plainly a personal-opinion essay whose author draws many individual conclusions, offers various observations and argues positions on conflicting critical theories, all without citation. There are a few scattered references in the piece, but it lacks any endnotes. The "plot summary" is excessively detailed. Jtcarpet (talk) 01:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cardillac-Syndrome edit

First of all: the link concerning the "Cardillac Syndrome" is dead, it should read "http://www.jf-archiv.de/archiv00/350yy40.htm" in order to work. Secondly, the link refers to a not quite relevant article in "Junge Freiheit", which is an ultra-conservative (to say the least) weekly newspaper and thus far from being an objective source. And thirdly: No psychologist I ever spoke to, no database or psychological dictionary I ever consulted mentions this syndrome at all. If anyone can refer to some source that is not redirected to Wiki I would be glad to believe this myth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.188.6.12 (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mademoiselle de Scuderi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply