Talk:Mallinatha

Svetambara image?

Ms Sarah Welch, I guess you are indulging in OR by claiming the statue to be of Svetambara affiliation. This statue has no such mention, please share a source where you see this statue been discribed as so. Further, this is a nude statue, and neither of Jain sects talk about nude Ascetism for female. So how can it be of Svetambara origin? In addition to that, Svetambara iconography is not evident on the statue. No decoration, no glass eyes, no throne, no clothes. Please share a WP:RS or withdraw your strange WP:OR. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that we remove the image? It is OR, by the person who uploaded it. I don't see any sources cited by the uploader. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

What makes you think that this statue is of a female? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Lets focus on OR, please. Do you have a source on behalf of the image uploader? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I am. Do you have any source of claiming a nude statue of to be of a female Jain Tirthankara? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Māllīnātha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150916101903/https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xI8HBgAAQBAJ to https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xI8HBgAAQBAJ

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)