Talk:Luther College (Victoria)

Cleanup

This article has been fixed by too many users and IPs to count. I just marked it with [[TUEBLUE]] (talk|contribs) 02:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

I've reinstated the section regarding the IT notebook program, save for the part about internet censorship. Everything else in that section is to best of my knowledge, factually correct. For the sake of probity, I was personally involved at the school during the connection of the internet link and the notebook program. Aussielocust (talk) 12:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:01-luther logo.jpg

Image:01-luther logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Inclusion of further information regarding the IT program

This article is missing some information to do with the nature and extent of the school's management of IT. Despite my attempts to add this, my changes have been consistently undone, and as such I would like to bring up the topic here for others to think about. AshKmo (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Like most articles about Australian schools, even elsewhere, this one is full of pointless, non-significant content about things that are common to almost all schools, plus a lot of useless trivia. Please provide evidence that there is something special about your proposed content. HiLo48 (talk) 04:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

I do not propose to create a whole lot of junk. I merely wanted to add a single sentence noting quickly that there is a policy in place. Perhaps including the policy as a source or something would atone for the alleged pointlessness of the addition. AshKmo (talk) 06:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)