Talk:Lunar Park

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

from Vfd

edit

On 13 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lunar Park for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 04:30, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

delete spike review in external links?

edit

maybe delete the spike.com review from the external links? it is poorly written and has some pretty big inaccuracies (the reviewer seems to think the book takes place in southern california which it clearly does not).

This plot summary just.. stops, as it gets sidetracked in talk about a fictional character's website. What about the end of the book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.175.37 (talk) 21:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lunar Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply