Talk:Lucretia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lucretia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tjna57. Peer reviewers: Googoogoo165, XAgememnonX.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 12 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BeckAnn B. Peer reviewers: PolluxMariusPetrus.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
onus - wrong word?
editFrom the article: He acquired the cognomen Brutus, "Dullard",[7] by playing the pleasant fool so as not to attract the king's onus.
Onus usually means responsibility. It has a couple of other, related meanings, but none seems appropriate here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.212.7.1 (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have removed the entire sentence. SilkTork (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Lucretia as a role model? Source doesn't seem to say that explicitly
editThe article says "Because of her devotion to her husband, Roman writers Livy and Dionysius outline Lucretia as the role model for Roman girls.", citing 'Wiseman, T.P. (1998). "Roman Republic, Year One". Greece and Rome (1 ed.). 45: 19–26. doi:10.1093/gr/45.1.19.', but from scanning through it I don't see where that particular article supports the claim. 2001:678:560:23:D129:99E1:146B:F03A (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)