This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This article, short as it is, is an absolute mess, confusing events of father (Consul 65 BC) and son (Quaestor 49 BC), both of the same name. The introduction and details of the death relate to the son, while the consulship with Cotta and the events with Catiline refer to the father. Will attempt to correct soon. Oatley2112 (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
"After the suppression of the Catiline conspiracy, Cotta proposed a public thanksgiving for Cicero's services, and because Torquatus had gone into exile for supporting Catiline, supported the view that there was no need of a law for his recall, since the Laws of Clodius were legally worthless." I don't even know where to begin with this sentence. Neither Torquatus nor his son went into exile because they supported Catiline, the Leges Clodiae date from Cicero's exile, not the period of Catiline, nor is it my understanding that the Leges Clodiae were "legally worthless", whatever that means. The only exile that comes anywhere near fitting into this scenario is Aulus Manlius Torquatus, an associate of Cicero, but he was in voluntary exile around 45 BC, and he had nothing to do with Catiline! Ye gods, what a mess! Oatley2112 (talk) 14:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
