Talk:Listowel mutiny

Untitled

Why is it likely?

“.. the exact words in all probability being the ones that Smyth was relaying....”

How would you know this?

Less sanitized version here.....

http://www.policehistory.utvinternet.com/listowel.html

To call this article a "sanitized version" is completely unfair and, I think, reflects the anonymous commentator's own POV.

There are two different versions of what was said at Listowel that day: Mee's, and Smyth's. The article's author seems to consider Smyth's version more reliable, and is not alone in this judgment: IIRC, Charles Townshend also came down on the side of Smyth in one of the standard workd on the War of Independence, The British Campaign in Ireland.

Nonetheless, other historians have concluded that Mee was the more reliable witness. The article should be revised to reflect the fact that there is disagreement over whose version of events was authoritative. Moreover, it should be stressed that, regardless of what actually happened, many people at the time believed Mee's account.

Historical judgments hardly count as "sanitization," except in the minds of the ideologically committed.--Cliodule (talk) 04:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality disputed?

Is the neutrality of this article still disputed? Not possible to tell from unsigned comments above if resolution was reached. RashersTierney (talk) 14:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Listowel mutiny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120908220242/http://www.policehistory.utvinternet.com/listowel.html to http://www.policehistory.utvinternet.com/listowel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)