Talk:List of tallest buildings in Los Angeles/Archive 1

Archive 1

Approved and under construction on list???

In the other languages, they added buildings that are under construction and (or) the Approved but not yet under construction. Should we add them on the english list also?--Redspork02 14:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

My personal opinion is that until they are built, they don't belong in the article unless there is some major controversy or other information on their distinctiveness. I would suggest that any list of approved and/or under construction skyscrapers should be kept on the article talk page. ^BlankVerse 03:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed renaming

This article should be renamed List of tallest buildings in Los Angeles since a large majority of the article consists of a list. Hydrogen Iodide 18:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:LAlive2.jpg

The image Image:LAlive2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

This article should be updated

The century and La Live are complete and should be taken off the "under construction" list and be put into the "tallest buildings list". Also Park Fifth tower 1 should be put into the approved list, and there should be made changes to the Grand Avenue Project column because they have made some cutbacks to the design. I would do it myself but I am a little confused as to how to do it. So please somebody make these changes. --A9l8e7n (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I believe all of your comments were addressed. I also went through the approved/proposed section to remove canceled projects and update the completion dates of others, and I updated the third paragraph of the introduction. Cheers, Rai•me 06:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

611 Place

The two linked references differ about the completion date of 611 Place. Since the timeline strongly suggests the 1969 date in SkyscraperPage is correct, I've changed the date in the main list from 1967 to 1969. Floatjon (talk) 16:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of tallest buildings in Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150402173229/http://www.emporis.com/application/?nav=building&lng=3&id=2055avenuenueofstreetstars-losangeles-ca-%7cusa to http://www.emporis.com/application/?nav=building&lng=3&id=2055avenuenueofstreetstars-losangeles-ca-%7cusa

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)