Talk:List of notable Blackpool F.C. players
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Move?
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to List of Blackpool F.C. players. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Blackpool F.C., due to size or style considerations. |
Consistency
editI plan, hopefully with assistance, to make this article consistent with other lists, but for now the article will only be displaying league stats. - Dudesleeper · Talk 17:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not moved. This is a merge request and not a move request. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
List of notable Blackpool F.C. players → List of Blackpool F.C. players –
- notability is assumed —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Many people would agree that 'List of players..' is better than 'List of notable players..' However there is already a real article (not a redirect) at List of Blackpool F.C. players which is trying to be a complete list, and you should get consensus on what to do about that. EdJohnston (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Merge -- We have two rival argumetns that are trying to do the same thing. The Move propsoal will overwrite the exisiting article, which would not be right, as it may be more complete. However the format of the subject article is better. The right answer is thus to merge them, by ensuring that the content of the target all appears in the article which is the subject of this discussion. THEN make the target a redirect to this article; THEN bring it to RM, so that an admin can overwrite the redirect with the present article. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.