Talk:List of multiple-system operators

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

First phrase edit

"A Multiple System Operator or Multi System Operator (MSO) is an operator of multiple systems"

sortable table edit

why isn't the table sortable like a normal one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.39.121 (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is that why India's "Siti Cable" is not placed correctly in the second table? I've also noticed that a few of the references for this article have expired, and I haven't been able to confirm some of the subscriber counts (especially the Indian telcos.) Scyllagist (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

From where did the technology classifications come? Verizon FiOS uses QAM (sending a "cable TV" signal over optical fiber) while AT&T U-Verse is a true IPTV provider. Now I don't know if I can trust any of the other entries. In a similar vein, Google Fiber doesn't even belong on the list, which calls into question the objectivity of the whole exercise. Frank MacCrory (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on List of multiple-system operators. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply