Talk:List of countries by Zoroastrian population

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Usps in topic Statistical data

"minorities of converted Zoroastrians"

edit

converted to? or from?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Zoroastrian Population Edits by AntonSamuel must be reverted and IntercontinentalEmpire's must be repaired

edit

Greetings and I must say that I'm in no mood for games and foolishness. I am a contributor to Wikipedia but every time I edit this page, my factual records of population of Zoroastrianism is consistently contested by a user named AntonSamuel. Even if I sourced my edits appropriately, I still get either shunned, harassed or even denied information. As if things can't get any worse, he even threatened to block me for no justified reason, this is injustice. The administration here is awful and I get bothered by someone abusing their admin power by targeting me for no reason. Please help me address this situation cause his actions towards me are highly unacceptable and I wish this nonsense to me stopped immediately. Also in future incidents like this, please evaluate the administrator first before doing anything cause the system here is highly corrupt and only features favoritism in the ranks. I should not be punished for at least trying to do the right thing here.

@IntercontinentalEmpire: I've explained my revert of the disruptive edits on my talk page and his: [1] [2] [3] AntonSamuel (talk) 23:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Statistical data

edit

I made an edit recently and it was undone, bringing other estimates for the number of Zoroastrians in countries like Pakistan, Iran, the United States. I referenced sources and they were inferred as "dubious". I cannot fail to observe a lack of criteria in this assessment. After all, a partial and non-independent source is accepted over 15,000 zoroastrians in Iraqi Kurdistan, but an official data of the Pakistani National Database (NADRA) that records 4,000 Parsi voters is "dubious" (NOTE: 4,000 VOTERS, not counting non-voters and people under the voting age, it's clear that 1,600 Parsis in Pakistan is an underestimate). Also, I included a maximum estimate of 60,000 zoroastrians in Iran, number affirmed by some Zoroastrian associations in Iran, and it's "dubious", but: What is the difference between this type of source (Zoroastrian associations in Iran) and the source used on the 15,000 Iraqi kurds (an Iraqi Kurdish Zoroastrian association)? If the 60,000 estimate of Iranian associations can't be accepted in the article, so why can the 15,000 estimate of Kurdish associations? I felt a lack of a clear criteria for select and accept the data used in this article. At the end of the day, I'm just trying to contribute to Wikipedia, and as an editor I'd like more clarity. I believe that my note and critics may be somehow pertinent! Usps (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply