Talk:List of compositions by Carl Nielsen (version 2)

POV in intro

Serious POV in the introductory paragraphs. While my own preference wouldn't be for rating the works against each other at all, this is utopian; the site does require citing someone when you do so, however. Schissel | Sound the Note! 11:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree. The commentary is a bit strong for being uncited. In my opinion, its unnecessary on a list page. Anyhow, that section is entirely the work of a single edit of User:Dono from back in early 2007. That editor is still active on Nielsen articles. We could ask if he'd be interested in toning down the introduction.DavidRF (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Done. Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking notes of this list (I think nobody will notice this list at all). I have to admit that when I wrote the introductory paragraph I wasn't aware of the tone, and during the past few years I revisited this list on several occasions and said to myself "man, I should have written it better", though I never attempted a rewrite. Finally someone sees the problem and thank you. Yes, I am happy to rewrite it but I can only do it at least few months later. For now I will remove the paragraphs to avoid the tone and citation problems. Dono (talk) 06:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

According to the page view tool accessible on the history page, the list received an average of 12 views per day last month, which is not too bad for a Wikipedia page, I think (don't know for sure). Schissel | Sound the Note! 11:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Sortable list

I will try to make a sortable list of the compositions, to replace the listings by FS and OP. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)