Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Euphoria

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Schwede66 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Schwede66 (talk03:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Converted from a redirect by CastJared (talk). Self-nominated at 16:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/List of awards and nominations received by Euphoria; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General eligibility:

  • New enough:  
  • Long enough:   - As mentioned above, it is too short. Per DYK criteria #2a: "Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables etc.)." Moreover, DYK criteria #1b requires that "The content that makes the article eligible must be new and original content on English Wikipedia." That is to say that the text in the tables and the text that was copied over from the Euphoria (American TV series) article does not count towards meeting the 1,500 minimum characters of prose. With that in mind, the new and original content in the article amounts to around 630 characters of prose currently.

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:   - Per DYK criteria #3, the hook facts must be mentioned in the article and supported by an inline citation to a reliable source. However, the hook mentions that House of the Dragon's Emma D'Arcy lost out for the Golden Globe Award, yet neither the actress nor the TV show are mentioned anywhere in the article.
  • Interesting:   - The hook essentially says that Actress A won an acting award over Actress B. This happens at every award ceremony, hence I don't think there is any unusual or intriguing aspect to the proposed hook.

QPQ:  
Overall:   Please refer to the DYK eligibility criteria. This article currently doesn't meet quite a lot of the criteria and will require considerable work to be eligible for DYK. Please let me know if you intend to work on the article to meet the criteria. Otherwise, I will regretfully have to fail this nomination. Bennv123 (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  •   @CastJared: since you've read and removed [1] the message I left on your talk page about this nomination (which is perfectly within your rights to do), and haven't responded on the nomination page or made any relevant changes to the article, I'm taking that to mean that you do not intend to see this nomination through. That is understandable as it will require a considerable commitment to see this one through as it currently stands. Regretfully, that means that I am updating my review to fail this nomination. If this was your first DYK nomination attempt, please don't be discouraged and try again once you've familiarized yourself with the DYK eligibility criteria. Bennv123 (talk) 09:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply