Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Louisiana

Type and quality rating of article edit

Although "list" is in the title, this article is more than a mere list and is to be rated on scale Stub/Start/B class, and eventually to be put up for Featured List status. See discussion at WP:NRHP for rating of list-tables of National Historic Landmarks. -- doncram (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

It can be rated both as a Start class article and as a List type in the Louisiana project. VerruckteDan (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
oh, neat. in other wikiprojects it is either class=start OR class=list. doncram (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Correspondence of photos in list article and in site articles edit

It's great that there are multiple photos available for some sites, especially in New Orleans. That's enabled having one pic in the List, then another 1 or 2 in the site article linked. However, I think it's best to be sure that the small pic in the list is one of those that appears in the site article, larger. I think readers will anticipate that they'll get to see the pic, now larger, when they go to the site article. It doesn't have to be done this way, and maybe i am being unimaginative, but i think that making them correspond in this way is better. doncram (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Importance of articles for New Orleans wikiproject. edit

Browsing Wikipedia:WikiProject New Orleans/Assessment#Importance rating, it seems that all the articles on NHLs in New Orleans proper, and in Plaquemines and St. Charles and some other parishes covered by WP NOLA, should be rated TOP. As NHLs, they have been deemed to have national importance. Seems perhaps TOP would be too high for all of them. So, say, rate them all as HIGH then. doncram (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of National Historic Landmarks in Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of National Historic Landmarks in Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply