Talk:List of Grade I listed buildings in Wiltshire

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Davidwr in topic This page is broken

??Hainham edit

I have changed 'Hainham' to 'Harnham' because Hainham does not exist in Salisbury and Harnham is the suburb into which the gate leads. Richard Avery (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

New layout edit

I've had a go at implementing a new layout for this article, to aid with people uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments. I have tried to make sure that the links, images, and references used in the previous version are retained. Mark Wheaver, who initially wrote the list, hasn't edited since 2010 so I haven't been able to contact him to check whether this change is ok, but I hope it is accepted. Nev1 (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Hi. It's fine - better than that, v pleased that someone has been working on it since I've changed job and am too busy! Major_Clanger (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Size edit

This page is now a member of Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. You can see that the navbox at the bottom is not transcluded because of this. Either the page needs to be slimmed down, the design or templates tweaked, or it needs to be split.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC).Reply

Good update by User:Pldx1 - removed 20 redundant ImagesofEngland templates, which generated 20 Cite templates.
We have 295 listings here. If the article has to be split in future, I suggest to split into churches (125) and the rest (170), along the same lines as Grade I listed churches in Cheshire and Grade I listed non-ecclesiastical buildings in Cheshire. Splitting alphabetically by name would work but can be awkward ("Remains of xyz" or "The xyz"). Splitting by place won't work because we have only 37 Salisbury, 14 Swindon, 6 Trowbridge. Wire723 (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grade I listed buildings in Wiltshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page is broken edit

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Historic sites#Recent template changes broke a few list-type articles, recommend splitting them to fix the problem for discussion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply