courts/taxation

edit

I edited the sentence that was recently reverted. The sentence does reflect a point of view, but the irony is noted in the article cited. It is a central point of that article. I think there's room for improvement in the phrasing, and I don't think this point should be eliminated. -Pete 18:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Libertarian Party.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Leadership dispute

edit

There were recently some IP edits, reverted by EncMstr, about disputed leadership in the party. I cannot find reliable sources about this, but this source -- which I'm not familiar with -- does offer some insight into what might be going on:

http://www.golocalpdx.com/news/libertarians-face-off-in-party-control-showdown

In the meantime, I suggest we delete the names of any (purported) leader, in the absence of definitive information; and list both web site. -Pete (talk) 22:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply